Thursday, June 15, 2006

Held Hostage While Been Fiscally Responsible

One of the first things one learns after receiving pay check as employee or business owner is that it has a finite number on the amount to be enjoy it. Usually, this amount is smaller than one hopes, thus we smartly learn to plan around this number, consequently the birth of our fiscally conservative and responsible behavior.
Now, 49% of Americans are imprudently using credit above their capacity to repay it in a prudent manner, and institutions with the alliance of lawmakers –republicans and democrats alike- enact laws allowing the debtor to increase their debt and guarantee the lender their risk.
Is that a fiscally conservative idea or is a risky liberal idea.

The funny thing if that hose driven by political demagoguery fail in the camp of so called fiscal conservatives, while the latest research on personal debt holders claims that 82% of those in default of personal debts call themselves conservatives. My first reaction was wow hypocrites, followed by “wow” liberalization of capital is been taken by the horns by imprudent conservatives thus lefties must be very smart prudent in fiscal matters.
I think the last statement is been proven correct by the present Washington crowd, from the largest deficit in the history of the country to the largest expenditures and indirect taxation ever and increase of federal imbalances.
So it is time for fiscal responsible folks to start to teach Washington a couple of lessons on fiscal responsibility and start to demand lower direct and indirect taxes.
The first thing is comes to mind is communication taxes. All taxes that arrive in your phone bill should be abolished. The government should take responsibility for people’s safety from the federal budget by supporting a national 911 service.
Next month read your phone bill, sum the amounts you pay in taxes for those services, let’s act and repel all communication taxes.
The second immediate tax to abolish should be all related to travel as for airport and airline taxes or gasoline taxes. In today’s world traveling as communicating is not a luxury it is a necessity, thus taxes are to be repeal in those activities, all the allocations should be planned from the general budgets from the states of federal government.
If you add the costs of those two taxes you are getting tripled taxed in those items by around 140%.
Some might oppose cutting taxes for some reason or another, the facts sustain that transportation and communication taxes should be totally eliminated. If you think like I do, call your elected officials, write a letter to the editor, let your opinion be known to others and we might be able to start to repeal some of those taxes that affect most of working Americans.

Legal Rape While Banning Abortion

The States of Alabama, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, have successfully enacted laws to ban de facto abortion rights in their states, and they consider themselves supra-religious states, and holders of some superior moral credo.
At the same time, these same states have common law marriages that allow the marriage of under age kids, in which the only requirement is cohabitation--the parties lived together and legal polygamy.

While the pray to the Lord, they let their kids get legally raped.

Although the definition may vary from state to state, the common features of a common law marriage are:
• Cohabitation--the parties lived together without age requirement.
• Consent--the parties intended to hold themselves out as husband and wife.
• Holding out--the parties "held themselves out" to the world as husband and wife (i.e. The parties spoke of each other as "my husband" or "my wife").
• Neither party was married to someone else.
This is the utmost hypocritical stance from the political power in those states.

At the same time these states are the most radical is the abolition of human rights.

Here is one of those cases in which, ignorance and hypocrisy are allied to build fallacies based on hate.

These states as the Colorado case resolved by the court today are prime examples of humanity degradation and faling into regression: http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/15/D8I8Q3CO0.html
The leaders in those states must be held accountable. Specially, those so called holders of family values, it will be not far fetched calling them promoters of under age rape.

A disgraceful state of affairs.

If that is what conservatism is all about, then we have a serious case for strictly repudiating those ideas and support the protection of minors. Protecting free speech with forward modern ideas and human rights are for sale in exchange for demagogery and radicalism.

The leaders of the country, Republicans and Democrats alike, have fail human rights, and they continue engage in policy enactments that curtail freedom and promote regressive acts towards all of us.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Why the Rich Get Richer

How to Profit From a Cooling Real Estate Market
by Robert Kiyosaki
Utility Links

Printable ViewEmail this PageTuesday, June 13, 2006
All over the U.S. there are stories of a rise in real estate foreclosures. Many people who took those exotic mortgages -- borrowing 125% of home value or choosing adjustable-rate mortgages -- are struggling to make their payments, and some aren't making it.

Also, a glut of new property supply, especially condominiums, is coming on line. A friend of mine, a very seasoned real estate investor, says in San Diego County, once one of the hottest real estate markets in the country, thousands of new condominiums are getting ready to come to market -- just as the market softens. He estimates that over 12,000 new units are coming on line, and the market, at the best of times, can only absorb about 1,000 condominiums a year. If he's correct, that means 12 years of supply will be ready for market in the next year.

As interest rates rise and the number of eager new buyers begins to diminish, adding supply to an already bad real estate market for sellers may mean a very good market for buyers and for property investors.

Hungry Alligators
The people who are in the most trouble are flippers -- people who aim to buy low and sell high within a short space of time. Many were buying condominiums off the plans, which means the projects were yet to be built, in the hopes that when the homes were completed, they would sell for a tidy profit. The trouble is many of these flippers, lured into the market by stories of people making a huge killing earlier with a similar strategy, are now the ones to be slaughtered. Now, they either lose their deposit or have to cough up the money for the purchase in the hopes there's a greater fool than they were somewhere out there real estate.

If you recall, the same thing happened around the year 2000 as amateurs jumped into the stock market, buying up tech stocks or any IPO with a dot-com after the company name.

In the coming months, I predict we'll see an increase in people dumping real estate they can't afford. They'll be forced to sell because they'll be eaten alive by a phenomenon known as negative cash flow. Investment properties that you have to feed money to every month are fondly known as alligators -- if you can't afford to feed the property every month, it eats you.

I know of one so-called real estate investor (and I prefer to call people like him speculators rather than investors) who has three homes he thought he could flip for a profit -- but he priced them too high. Now, $7,500 comes out of his pocket every month to feed the negative-cash-flow alligators. The problem is, he and his wife don't earn that much a month. Their three alligators are literally eating them out of house and home, consuming the profits they made from other flips -- and their savings.

To add more pain to the misery, they still have to pay the capital-gain taxes they made from their previous successful flips. They're toast. The alligators are eating them alive. They can't afford to feed them, and they can't afford to sell them because the prices they paid for these alligators are more than they're worth today. And this is only one story -- out of who knows how many. Over the next couple of years, keep your eyes open for some great bargains.

It's Time for the Pros
Some people say we're now entering a bad real estate market. I disagree. I think we're entering a great market. A bad one is when amateur investors become real estate experts and they bid up prices. They make housing expensive for homeowners, often adding little to no value to the property. They simply muddy the waters and make a valuable investment, a home, expensive.

Now, I must admit, I sometimes do buy to flip, so I can't be too critical. Yet it's the amateurs who come late to the party -- and who eventually donate their money back to the professionals. What I'm saying is: Now is the time to turn pro. Now is not the time to be an amateur. It's the amateurs who jump in when the market is hot. It's the professional who comes in when it's cooling down. Get the message?

When the red-hot bull market of real estate was beginning to overheat, you didn't have time to make considered decisions. Sellers were receiving multiple, over-asking-price offers. In a bull market, you had to be quick, have money, and be a little foolish. Now that the market is cooling down, sellers are a little bit more humble. You have more time and can do your due diligence carefully. You can negotiate better terms and make a better deal, especially if the seller has his leg inside an alligator's jaws.

Bad News That's Good
But don't be in too much of a hurry. I think we still have some bad news yet to come -- and I believe it may come from the bond market. I suspect that many of our foreign investors who have been buying our debt may be becoming more cautious about investing in American assets, especially U.S. bonds. Many foreign bankers may be having doubts about the U.S. government paying the interest on our debt. In other words, many investors will be moving increasingly out of their cash into tangible assets such as gold, silver, and other metals. Again, this is only a suspicion. We should know more by September of this year.

If investors stop buying U.S. government debt, who knows what might happen? The U.S. may need to raise interest rates even higher, which will drive home values down even further. So be patient, keep looking at real estate, but keep your hand on your wallet (unless of course you find a seller with a really mean alligator eating him alive).

A year ago, I sent out a warning to investors, especially flippers, to cash out quickly. I received a lot of irate e-mails from people who thought I was turning on them. They thought I was spreading bad news. Little did they know that by forecasting a real estate downturn, I was spreading good news -- good news for real investors and bad news for amateur alligator wrestlers.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Distracter in Chief

Spinning Phony Crises to Avoid Real Ones
By Eugene Robinson
Tuesday, June 6, 2006; A15
What uncharted realm lies beyond brazen cynicism? A wasteland of utter shamelessness, perhaps? A vast Sahara of desperation, where principle goes to die? Someday George W. Bush and the Republican right will be able to tell us all about this barren terra incognita, assuming they ever find their way home.

The Decider's decision to whip up a phony crisis over same-sex marriage -- Values under attack! Run for your lives! -- is such a transparent ploy that even conservatives are scratching their heads, wondering if this is the best Karl Rove could come up with. Bush might as well open his next presidential address by giving himself a new title: The Distracter.

Let's check in on what's happening in the real world:

Iraq has become a charnel house for the victims of escalating sectarian slaughter. On Saturday, a car bomb killed 28 people in Shiite-dominated Basra, and hours later gunmen killed nine Sunni worshipers in a mosque. On Sunday, on a road near Baghdad, assassins pulled travelers out of their minivans, sorted them by faith, killed nearly two dozen Shiites and let the Sunnis go. Yesterday, men wearing police uniforms grabbed at least 56 people from bus stations and travel agencies in Baghdad and took them away -- no one knows why, no one knows where.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's new government remains toothless and ineffectual, despite his pledge to end the sectarian violence. On Sunday, he failed yet again to reach agreement on who will run the only two ministries that matter -- the ones in charge of the army and the police. The butcher Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the most prominent figure in the armed Sunni insurgency and the most hunted man in Iraq, remains at large and periodically manages to issue messages inspiring his followers to continue their jihad. (Just like his hero, Osama bin Laden.) Yet the president spent his weekend radio address pushing "a constitutional amendment that defines marriage in the United States as the union of a man and woman."

Immigration, the last artificial crisis, at least is a genuine issue. But the president and his allies did such a job of rabble-rousing that the best outcome, at this point, is probably for Congress to deadlock and end up doing nothing. The National Guard is headed for the frontier, apparently under orders not to do much of anything. Immigrants are still marching north, employers are still hiring them and self-appointed sentries are still patrolling the border, where something really bad is bound to happen sooner or later.

Yet the issue of "profound importance" the president urgently wants to highlight is "protecting the institution of marriage."

The diplomatic maneuvering over Iran's nuclear program, which looks like the next crisis, is at a critical point. Defiant words from Iranian leaders on Sunday rattled the world's financial markets yesterday and sent oil prices soaring -- threatening even the modest relief most analysts had predicted from $3-a-gallon prices at the gas pump. Just in time for summer vacation.

The president, however, would rather we all reflect on the fact that "marriage is the most enduring and important human institution." Not satisfied that he had gotten his message across in his Saturday radio address, Bush gave another speech in support of a marriage amendment yesterday.

It's almost surreal. For one thing, the president has no role in amending the Constitution. Proposed amendments must be passed in both the House and Senate by two-thirds majorities, and then they must win approval from the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. The president doesn't have to sign it. He doesn't even have to read it.

People who are close to the president are always telling us what an essentially decent man he is, without a bigoted bone in his body. But that doesn't square with all this demagoguery in support of a measure whose only effect would be to write discrimination against gay men and lesbians into the United States Constitution.

Bigotry, pure and simple.

But of course the president knows that there's essentially no chance an amendment to ban gay marriage will make it out of the Senate -- that in fact it might not even get out of the House. All he can possibly accomplish is to energize activists on the religious right, who otherwise might be tempted to sit out the November midterm elections.

It's risky to raise expectations you have no intention of fulfilling, but maybe enough of the Republican base can be fooled by this charade to make a difference in the fall.

Meanwhile it keeps us from talking about things that are real, and that really matter.